7 rape scenarios found in Malaysian law that you probably didn't know aboutabout 2 years ago Denise C.
Back in 2015, the Penang’s Women’s Centre for Change provided statistics that said that one woman is subject to sexual crimes every 35 minutes in Malaysia. Given the news reports recently, it seems like rape has become a bigger problem in Malaysia.
From the alleged rape of a passenger by her Grab driver to the rape of a teenager by a 19 year old boy and even the heinous actions of the father dubbed, “Monster Dad” who faces a total of 626 charges related to sexual offences committed on his own daughter, Malaysians have been equally outraged and horrified by the deluge of rape, incest, statutory rape, and child sexual abuse reported by the media.
The latest news that was reported was that a mother in Kuching has been arrested for pimping out her 14 year old daughter who was prostituted to a man in order to pay off her mother’s debts. Aside from the mother’s arrest, the man who had sex with the 14 year old girl is now wanted for rape by the Malaysian police.
While statutory rape, incest, and child sex abuse would be dealt with in another article, this article aims to break down what is the legal definition of rape (we would like to point out that the law on rape is gender specific).
First, how does Malaysian law define rape?
We are all familiar with the idea that if anyone says no and their partner still continues to subject them to sexual intercourse, then it is rape. Beyond that, the Penal Code also states that penetration is sufficient enough to constitute sexual intercourse for the purposes of rape. This means that the moment penetration occurs together with any of the scenarios listed in the Penal Code, it would be considered rape.
In Malaysia, rape is typically punishable with up to twenty years in prison and whipping but the law also specifies 11 different scenarios where if rape happens alongside those scenarios, the punishment for rape can be extended up to thirty years in prison. Examples of these scenarios are when the victim is below 12 years old, where the rapist is aware that he is infected with a disease that can be transmitted through sexual intercourse and when the victim goes insane/commits suicide because of the rape.
The Penal Code gives us several scenarios where rape can occur. We will deal with the scenario that most Malaysians are aware of before moving on to the rest in the next section.
Section 375 (in part) Penal Code:
“A man is said to commit “rape” who, except in the case hereinafter excepted, has sexual intercourse with a woman under circumstances falling under any of the following descriptions:
(a) against her will;
(b) without her consent...”
The scenario pointed out in (a) and (b) are the ones that most Malaysians are familiar with is when rape occurs against someone’s will and without their consent. Typically, we associate this with the victims saying no (any other similar words) or showing signs of struggles in order to stop the sexual advances. For example, if person A proceeds to penetrate person B even after she has indicated that consent is not given and it is against her will, then it is considered rape.
While many of us typically relate consent and will as manifesting in words, it is important to bear in mind that just because someone did not speak out/struggle against the sexual intercourse or “fought back”, that it means that the sex was consented to. For example, if person A proceeds to penetrate person B and she does not speak out/fight back, it does not mean that person B is not being raped.
This means that even if someone submits to sexual intercourse, it might not mean that she consents to it.
”...there is a difference between consent and submission; every consent involves a submission, but it by no means follows that a mere submission involves consent.” – Dunn LJ, R v Olugboja.
Points (c) to (g) will be discussed in the next section.
Even if the victim said “Yes”, it can still be considered rape
Scenarios (a) and (b) present the more straightfoward situations in which rape can happen. Here, we look at the rest of the scenarios from (c) to (g):
Section 375 (in part):
“A man is said to commit “rape” who, except in the case hereinafter excepted, has sexual intercourse with a woman under circumstances falling under any of the following descriptions...
(c) with her consent, when her consent has been obtained by putting her in fear of death or hurt to herself or any other person, or obtained under a misconception of fact and the man knows or has reason to believe that the consent was given in consequence of such misconception;
(d) with her consent, when the man knows that he is not her husband, and her consent is given because she believes that he is another man to whom she is or believes herself to be lawfully married or to whom she would consent;
(e) with her consent, when, at the time of giving such consent, she is unable to understand the nature and consequences of that to which she gives consent;
(f) with her consent, when the consent is obtained by using his position of authority over her or because of professional relationship or other relationship of trust in relation to her;
(g) with or without her consent, when she is under sixteen years of age.”
Simplified, the situations given above are as follows:
(c) When consent has been obtained by putting the woman under a fear of death/hurt to herself or any other person
(c) When consent has been obtained by a misconception of fact and the man knows/has reason to believe that consent was given under this misconception
(d) When consent is given because she believes that the man is her husband/someone she would consent to sexual intercourse with
(e) When consent is given when she is unable to understand what she is consenting to
(f) When consent is given because it was obtained due his position of authority over her/any professional relationship/any relationship of trust
(g) When consent is given but she is under 16 years old (this is known as statutory rape and will be dealt with in another article)
Consent obtained through fear of death/hurt (c)
Dealing with the first scenario, an example of this would be where if person A threatens that he would kill or hurt person B if she does not agree to have sex with him or if person A threatens that he would murder/harm someone else if person B does not consent to have sex with him. The reason why this consent is not valid is clear – the “consent” was obtained through causing the other person to fear death or harm. This was how Canny Ong was abducted by her rapist and was eventually murdered.
Consent obtained through misconception of facts (c)
For the second scenario, this relates to when there is a mistake over the facts concerning the situation at hand. An example of this that most Malaysians would be familiar with is where a bomoh claims to be able to cure a woman of her sickness through sexual intercourse or where a doctor claims to be treating a patient but instead rapes her. An 1877 UK case of R v Flattery also highlights this. The rapist told the girl that he was carrying out an operation to cure her but was actually raping her. The court held that her consent to the “operation” is to be dismissed because it was obtained through fraud.
Consent obtained through belief that the person is her husband/sexual partner (d)
The next scenario is where the woman consents to the sexual intercourse with the belief that the person she was sleeping with is her husband or sexual partner. For example, if person A knows that he is not person B’s husband/sexual partner but still proceeds to engage in sexual intercourse even when he knows that she only consented because she thought he was her husband/sexual partner, person A would be guilty of rape.
Consent obtained when she is unable to understand/through a position of authority (e) and (f)
For consent given when she is unable to understand what she is consenting to, this is typically where the woman is not in the right state of mind to provide consent. This may include scenarios when the woman is drunk, asleep, unconscious, etc. As for consent obtained through a position of authority/professional relationship/relationship of trust, an example of this would be where a boss tells his female employee that if she does not have sex with him, she would lose her job.
There is more than meets the eye for the laws regarding rape
As you can see from the examples given above, the law regarding rape is not just related to a simple “No”. There are many factors involved in finding someone guilty of rape and deciding whether the consent was actual. Further to that, while Malaysia law does not recognise marital rape, a woman who is living separately from her husband after commencing divorce proceedings or who has filed an injunction against her husband, is not considered a wife for the purposes of charging a crime of rape.
The same goes for a Muslim woman who lives separately from her husband during the period of “iddah”, she would not be considered a wife for the purposes of finding her husband guilty of rape.
Section 375 (in part) Penal Code:
(a) living separately from her husband under a decree of judicial separation or a decree nisi not made absolute; or
(b) who has obtained an injunction restraining her husband from having sexual intercourse with her,
shall be deemed not to be his wife for the purposes of this section.
A Muslim woman living separately from her husband during the period of ‘iddah, which shall be calculated in accordance with Hukum Syara’, shall be deemed not to be his wife for the purposes of this section.”
At the end of the day, it is always important to have respect for your fellow human beings. Beyond that, communication goes a long way in bed (and out of it) in order to find out if your partner really does consent to the intercourse (and for other more pleasurable things as well). It is also important to bear in mind that just because the law may have certain loopholes that need addressing, does not mean that it is okay to exploit those loopholes. What is legally wrong might be ethically sound and vice versa. Societal ethics evolve at a different rate than the law and therefore, it is always important to exercise judgment.
Rape is also never the victim’s fault. It is not about the length of a dress or even about one’s sexual history. Neither is rape only limited to females or is about sexual gratification (it is about the exertion of dominance and power) so resorting to the legalisation of prostitution would not address this problem. What is needed is a change in mindsets to address the rape culture and a better understanding of the nuances of rape and consent.
If you are a victim or knows someone who requires assistance…
Here is a list of the basic things that you can do:
- Get to a safe place. This means that you should try to distance yourself away from your attacker and seek the help of trusted friends or family members
- Do not bathe. This is essential as bathing or washing yourself would wash away crucial evidence that could help the police arrest and charge your attacker
- Head to a police station or a government hospital in order to file a police report or get a check up. An important point to note that according to Malaysia’s One Stop Crisis Centre policy, the hospitals must prescribe medication for exposure to prevent sexually transmitted diseases (“STDs”) and also emergency contraception. This means that even if you are hesitant to approach the police, it is best to head to a hospital to protect yourself against STDs and unwanted pregnancies.
Further to that, there are several numbers that you can contact for further information and counselling:
Women’s Aid Organisation: 03 7956 3488/ 018 988 8058 (Whatsapp)
All Women’s Action Society: 03 7877 4221