Asklegal
Home banner 25d5fd7a 6af7 4af6 b7d9 8f8f25a34d01

Civil

Can Selangor residents sue the factory owners who caused the water disruption?

2020-09-07 Default avatar Ariff Kamil

95

Shares

A+

A-

This article is for general informational purposes only and is not meant to be used or construed as legal advice in any manner whatsoever.

A+

A-


When Selangor’s water disruption was announced to last four days, the state’s residents were understandably upset. The reason for the water cut: pollution at the water source. The suspect: a factory in Rawang, which was discovered shortly after it happened. Turns out, this wasn’t the factory’s first offence – they’ve actually committed the same one in March during the MCO. The factory, Yip Chee Seng & Sons Sdn Bhd, was only fined RM60,000.

Four brothers who were the factory owners have already been arrested. To some people, that might not be enough, as there have been questions on whether we can sue them. 

The Consumers Association of Kedah (CAKE) has offered to sue them on behalf of consumers in Selangor. The question now is, since the factory owners have been arrested, could you sue them for causing the water disruption?

Well, technically...no.

 

Why can’t you sue the factory owners?

The responsible factory. Image from The Rakyat Post

Because in this case, the responsible party for the pollution was the factory, which is considered as an entity by itself. In this case, the owners are considered the ‘directors’ of the company, because when you create a private limited company, it is an entity by itself, separate from the owners.

[READ MORE: Sendirian Berhad companies exist today because this man won a lawsuit in 1893]

This is similar for criminal cases. Unless there are specific provisions, you can’t “lift the corporate veil” – which basically means charging the directors themselves. This specific provision did happen this time, as the directors were charged under the Water Services Industry Act 2006. Under Section 165 of the Act, the director can be charged together or separately with the company, for any offences done by the company.

But even if you can’t sue the directors, you can still sue the company. Because under the law, companies are technically “people” which means they can be sued.

In general, if someone’s action has caused you harm, in this case polluting our water supply, they can still be sued. It can happen, even if the company directors are already charged with a crime.

Acording to the lawyer we consulted, Tanusha Sharma:

“Even if (the factory directors) have been charged criminally for their actions, the (company) could also fit the bill for a negligence suit.” – Tanusha Sharma, lawyer

In short: yes, you can sue the company, but not the owners. But when suing someone, that person must have done a wrongdoing (tort) that affected you. And in this water pollution case, the factory owners would likely be sued for negligence. In these cases, there are mainly 4 things to prove:

  • they owe a duty of care
  • that duty of care was breached
  • there was a causation (the incident was caused by them)
  • the damages are not too remote (that means the damages were foreseeable)”  

[READ MORE: Did you know you can be taken to court for something that is NOT a crime?]

So based on these four criteria, it might be possible. The company had a duty to not pollute the rivers, which was obviously breached when their waste leaked into the river. Since we can pinpoint that it was done by them, and that the effect (stopping the water supply to clean their mess) was a direct result of their actions, the tort of negligence can apply to them.

 

It’s easier to sue as a group 

Learn from Voltron – fight together! Image from Giphy

Basically, when you sue someone, it’s because they have harmed you personally. But in cases where someone’s action harmed a lot of people, it’s probably best to do it together. This is called a class action suit. 

Technically, you could still sue them by yourself. But there are a few reasons to do it as a group. The first one is financial.

“(legal fees) will definitely be cheaper if you sue as a class action suit, as you split the legal costs among a large group.” – Tanusha

But that isn’t the only reason. 

“For cases of this nature, which involves damage inflicted to large groups, a class action is a more suitable way of going. Because it’s not just one individual who is affected, but rather almost the whole of Selangor.

So it would make sense to sue as a class action, as most would have the same grievances on the same subject matter, and are seeking the same remedies.

The impact of a big group bringing the claim could also play a factor in the strength of the claim.” – Tanusha

Basically, suing on behalf of a large group of people is useful, since everyone is suing for the same thing. Having a large number would also make your case much stronger in the eyes of the court.

 

This lawsuit can go up to a few million

Image from Twitter

There have been complaints on social media that the RM60,000 fine for the factory is not enough, as it has assets worth nearly RM60 million. If you’re one of them, you might be glad to know that they can be sued for millions this time.

We can look at the Sivagangga cluster case, where the shop owner who started the cluster was sued for RM1.5 million by CAKE.

“The Sivagangga cluster suit involved a class action suit of over 100 residents and business owners. So when there's such a large group and you're taking into account the financial losses suffered by them due to being quarantined, its gonna well reach high figures.” – Tanusha

CAKE is planning to start their civil case against the factory soon, and we’ll have to wait and see the results of it. But considering that 1.2 million people were affected by the water cut, we can expect to see a large torrent of support for a high fee.

Tags:
tort
sue
factory
pollution
yap chee seng
selangor
water cut
water services industry act 2006
rawang
river
Default avatar

About the Author Ariff Kamil


95

Shares

A+

A-