Home banner 5b1b8c12 5616 4385 82ef f1073643652c


From now till GE15, Malaysia has no Prime Minister or MPs. So who's running the country?

about 5 years ago RhoshvinSingh





This article is for general informational purposes only and is not meant to be used or construed as legal advice in any manner whatsoever. All articles have been scrutinized by a practicing lawyer to ensure accuracy.



Note: The article was originally published in April 2018, and updated in October 2022.


After a week of speculation, where PM Ismail Sabri met with the YDPA not once but twice, it’s official: election time is finally here.

PM Ismail Sabri announced the dissolution of Parliament on 10 October 2022 after obtaining consent from the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. As for the election date, we will need to wait for it to be announced by the Election Commission.

As a result of that, every seat in the House of Representatives (Dewan Rakyat) – becomes vacant. Until the new government is elected, all Members of Parliament (“MPs") are no longer MPs. They lose all their parliamentary privileges and revert to being ordinary members of the public. 

This means that for a brief period until the new government is elected, we do not have an ‘official government’.

Soooooooo…….. who’s in charge and runs our country now?


Actually, the same people

Still here in our hearts. Image from PMO via BFM.

After the dissolution of Parliament, the current government and its existing members still remain in charge of their departments, until the leader of the winning party in an election meets the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to obtain consent to form a new government. So, technically, PM Sabri and his cabinet ministers still remain in office and stay in their jobs until then. The only difference is that they cannot use the title 'MP', as they are no longer one. 

The first thing that comes to mind is why don’t they lose their jobs if they are no longer an MP anymore?

To answer that, let’s take a look at what our Federal Constitution has to say on this point:

Article 40 of the Federal Constitution (in part):

”In the exercise of his functions under this Constitution or federal law the Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall act in accordance with the advice of the Cabinet or a Minister under the general authority of the Cabinet...”

Article 43(1) of the Federal Constitution (in part):

“The Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall appoint a Jemaah Menteri (Cabinet of Ministers) to advise him in the exercise of his functions.”

From the above, one can safely say that, in normal circumstances, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong will have to appoint a Cabinet or Minister to advise him in the course of his duties. Be that as it may, the Federal Constitution is silent as to whether or not this advisory role continues after dissolution of Parliament as there are no express statements (provisions) on that.

This issue appears to have been clarified by the Federal Court decision of Abdul Ghani bin Ali Ahmad & Ors v Public Prosecutor [2001] 3 MLJ 561. Here, the Federal Court decided that since the word ‘shall’ was drafted into Articles 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution respectively, this shows that the Cabinet Ministers must exist at all times. Hence, there cannot be a ‘gap’ of government as there must always be a government to continuously advise the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.

With that, the Federal Court indirectly held that a government exists even during the period when Parliament is dissolved. This government is known as the ‘caretaker government’, as they are in charge of taking care of the country until a new government is formed. The leader of the current caretaker government will be PM Sabri, who will be the ‘caretaker Prime Minister'. Similarly, at state level, after the dissolution of the respective state legislative assemblies (Dewan Undangan Negeri), the current state governments will continue to administer as caretaker governments.

Still, despite the Federal Court’s interpretation of Articles 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution, there is no Malaysian law that defines the role and function of a caretaker government. So, where did the concept of a caretaker government come from?


It all started, a long time ago...

Image from

The concept of a caretaker government is not developed through law. It is a convention that is practiced in Commonwealth countries such as the United Kingdom and Australia. Before we get into the specifics of a convention, let’s talk about how conventions developed in the first place.

As all laws are always linked with the past, the same can be said about conventions. You may have come across the terms written laws and unwritten laws. Written laws are plain simple, they basically refer to laws that are contained in any form of official document. Unwritten laws on the other hand are the portion of laws that are not passed by the Parliament and cannot be found in any other document. They are developed through English common law, decisions of the courts, and customs.

[READ MORE: Where does Malaysia get its laws from?]    

This was exactly how conventions came about – unwritten rules that have emerged from customs, understandings and practices. They are rules of political practice that have been transmitted from generation to generation in Westminster-style (what we call the Parliament in the UK) parliamentary systems and other commonwealth countries and, after repeated practice, they have become formalised into a rule of conduct called conventions.

As we are part of the Commonwealth, these practices and forms of political behaviour have gradually crept into our parliamentary system from the days of British rule. We have even developed our own conventions throughout the years. Here are a couple of conventions that exist in Malaysia:

  • Under the tradition and convention set by the Conference of Rulers, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong is appointed based on a rotating monarchy system among the Sultans.
  • Although there’s no law to say this, it’s a social and political norm that the Prime Minister has to be Malay. Further reading here, here, and here

Although conventions are largely acknowledged and accepted, they cannot be enforced by the courts since they are not laws. So, any government found to have breached a convention will not face any form or mode of punishment. Be that as it may, conventions are rarely breached because it usually gives rise to criticisms that can ultimately result in a loss of support by the public.

Perhaps it might be easier to just think of conventions like weddings – there are “accepted” traditions that a couple have to go through, like a kenduri or a tea ceremony, but not doing it doesn’t make them any less married in the legal sense (as long as they’ve registered). The only major repercussion they’ll have to deal with from not following these traditions are disapproving in-laws or gossiping relatives. 


Things caretaker governments can and cannot do

They have to return ‘jentera kerajaan’… get it? Image from bebasnews.

Basically, the function of a caretaker government is to ensure that the ordinary day-to-day administration of a country continues without disruption during the dissolution of Parliament. However, a caretaker government is only a minimum government as it does not have the mandate of the people. As such, a caretaker government cannot do anything that can bind a future government.

Although there are no provisions on this, it is strongly believed that a caretaker government should NOT:

  1. Make any major policy decisions which will bind a future government;
  2. Enter into any major contracts
  3. Make any significant appointments; and
  4. Make any international visits to avoid entering into major international agreements that can tie a new government.

If Parliament is dissolved to pave way for an election, there are further rules of conventions that caretaker governments must abide by to ensure that it does not gain an unfair advantage over other political parties. As caretaker governments are technically still in office, there is potential for abuse in using government or state machinery during political events during election campaigns.

With regard to this, firstly, all MPs must firstly return all the facilities granted and provided to them by the Dewan Rakyat and Dewan Undangan Negeri, such as their official cars.

Also, a caretaker government must not use any public resources and funds during the general election. As a note, this would not apply to programmes such as BKM, as technically any application of aid that has been budgeted and approved by the Parliament and the respective state legislative assemblies can be handed out because it has been passed beforehand.


What if you need your MP’s help during this time?

Winter Is Coming | BRACE YOURSELVES ELECTIONS ARE COMING | image tagged in winter is coming | made w/ Imgflip meme maker

As of now, there is no code of conduct that caretaker governments must abide by in law when Parliament is dissolved. However, there are proposals by the Attorney-General and the Election Commission to formalize code of conducts for caretaker governments into law. Meanwhile, Bersih has been pushing for the implementation of a code of conduct as well. A full list of the do’s and don’ts of a caretaker government proposed by Bersih can be found here.

If you have any issues during this period, you can still meet your local MP to address your problems. However, remember that since they have “lost” their title as MP, they may not have the resources nor the obligation to assist you.

federal constitution
caretaker government
ismail sabri





6eccf603 81da 4e66 b2cf 59e7adb3817c