Asklegal
Home banner 15c88103 5abe 41ae ad32 3f72f6b1b720

Criminal

Malaysiakini is charged for contempt of court...because of their readers' comments?

2020-06-17 Default avatar Ariff Kamil

57

Shares

A+

A-

This article is for general informational purposes only and is not meant to be used or construed as legal advice in any manner whatsoever.

A+

A-


If you’ve been on the internet long enough, you’ve probably heard this advice: never read the comments. This advice applies to nearly every platform, whether on Facebook, Youtube, and especially Youtube. It’s because the comment section can attract those who speak from a more emotional place (read: angry), and they might write some...not-very-nice comments.

You would think that it’s not a big deal, that these are just anonymous commenters shouting into the void of the internet. But as it turns out, in Malaysia, it can be a pretty big deal. Not to the commenters, but to the site where the comments are written.

Recently, Malaysia’s Attorney-General, Tan Sri Idrus Harun, filed an application for contempt of court against Malaysiakini. Not for something Malaysiakini wrote, but for five comments left by readers in their comments section. We’re not sure what the comments were, but you can check the article to try and figure it out. The comments were said to scandalise the court, as it indirectly attacked Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, exposed the judiciary to public scandal, and would lead to an erosion of public confidence in the judiciary.

You might wonder, how are internet comments considered contempt of court, when it’s done outside of a courtroom? Well, as we found out…

 

It’s more than just insulting the court

But what exactly is contempt of court? We interviewed a lawyer, Tanusha Sharma, to help explain this.

“Contempt of court to put it simply is you being disobedient or disrespectful to the court and its officers.” – Tanusha Sharma, lawyer, in an interview through email

And being disrespectful to the court can be interpreted quite widely.

It's what the court deems to be scandalizing the court, but precedence does help.” – Tanusha

Contempt of court is based on common law. This just means that there are no specific acts created for contempt of court. Acts of contempt were dealt with based on how previous judges dealt with it before. So if you want to bring someone to court over it, you have to do something called committal proceedings, which is provided in the Rules of Court 2012. And this is seen under Order 52 of the Rules of Court, which covers contempt of court. Basically, you fill up a form and tell the court that someone is in contempt of court.

Contempt of court also covers more than just insulting the court. There are actually two forms of contempt: civil contempt and criminal contempt

  • Civil contempt: you don’t comply with a court order and refuse to obey it. Here’s a simple example: suppose the court tells your neighbour to stop parking his car in front of your house. But a few days after that, he does it again. In this case, you can then take out a committal proceeding. The court will then call your neighbour to explain himself. If they find him guilty, he can be cited for contempt of court. 
  • Criminal contempt: this would cover insulting judges or court officers. But if you try to obstruct justice or mislead the court, you can also be held in contempt.

But regardless of whether it’s a civil or criminal contempt, the result is criminal. This just means that the court will either fine or imprison you for doing so

If you think you can avoid this by not saying anything in court, think again because...

 

Contempt of court can happen outside of the court

Now, based on the phrase itself, contempt of court, it might imply that it’s only for doing or saying something in court. But contempt of court does not have to happen inside the courtroom itself. It could happen anywhere, and as the case shows, in the comments section of an article. According to Tanusha:

“As long as you fit the bill for contempt, you can be committed for contempt. So this means that if you got a court order to comply with and you don't, you can be comitted. If you insult the court, you can be committed. And yes, even those outside court can be committed for comments.” – Tanusha

It might seem excessive to charge someone for insulting the court. But there’s actually a good reason for that. 

“The judiciary has always been looked at as an independent body who shall always be fair and deliver justice.  The courts play a significant role in protecting the integrity of the judicial process and to ensure a smooth and fair process in a case. Not only that, if people are free to criticize court officers or disobey court orders, this in a way undermines their authority and could cause the public to lose confidence in in the efficiency or fairness of the judiciary. So this gets in the way of delivering justice in a fair manner." – Tanusha

Basically, the court needs to be able to make their decisions without outside pressure. If we’re allowed to insult the court, they will be under negative pressure to perform. This might affect their judgements, which leads to more negative pressure, which will affect their judgements, which leads to...you can see where this is going. A vicious cycle, indeed.

But there’s still one thing left unaddressed: why is Malaysiakini charged for something their readers did? Well, that’s because...

 

If it’s on your site, it’s assumed to be yours

Think of it like this: imagine your neighbour was robbed, and the cops were going house to house in the neighbourhood to look for the suspect. They check your house, and they find your neighbour’s missing belongings in your house. Unless you can prove you didn’t put it there, you’re assumed to be responsible for the crime, because the evidence was found in your house.

Similarly, in Malaysia, if someone writes a comment on your website, you’re considered responsible for it. This is stated in Section 114A of the Evidence Act 1950:

114a. (1) A person whose name, photograph or pseudonym appears on any publication depicting himself as the owner, host, administrator, editor or sub-editor, or who in any manner facilitates to publish or re-publish the publication is presumed to have published or re-published the contents of the publication unless the contrary is proved.

Basically, under our laws, if a malicious comment appears on Malaysiakini’s site, they’re assumed to be the one who published, or republished it

So now that you know this, please be nice when commenting on AskLegal guys. Later we also kena. 

Tags:
rules of court 2012
evidence act 1950
contempt of court
chief justice
malaysiakini
tengku maimun tuan mat
Default avatar

About the Author Ariff Kamil


57

Shares

A+

A-